A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours above the development of a wall at a coastal web site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children household at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments article about René Collier and the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a remarkably publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, seek out to develop their family members household. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven people. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being built by their future neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their web site, bringing about an encroachment over a Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, therefore regions are issue to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, significantly in the sensitive coastal natural environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, and that is partially built, is in the proper placement. Their legal workforce has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal scheduling disputes, the place sights of The ocean are equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, Based on sworn proof referenced in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image that has since turn out to be emblematic on the intensity on the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they were being meant to Collect Visible proof of your wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water during intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become The most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included intimately through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as viewers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second within the legal timeline.
With the core of your dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as constructed, goes outside of what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling paperwork, maps, and ailments attached to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is motivated by issue for environmental protection and adherence to preparing law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as an alternative that it is about making sure that improvement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got described their extensive-standing connection to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few merely attempting to make a relatives residence in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Area of Conservation and say that every one works happen to be carried out depending on Specialist assistance and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea throughout a storm, do not alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than development of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for any situation a large number of observers see as progressively common. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is now a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances short article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Formerly been involved with neighborhood advocacy on scheduling and environmental concerns, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from quite different Expert backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-large drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded through midsection-substantial h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting equally the Bodily reality with the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an too much technique.
As being the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome continues to be uncertain. The court docket should decide if the wall as constructed complies with scheduling authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Special Spot of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and organizing disorders. Still the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell along with one another long following the lawful expenses are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design functions at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend past that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the necessity of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when basic concerns like environmental protection and assets legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of normal splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent times.